No, Ed Sheeran did not copy Marvin Gaye's "Let's Get It On" song.

The British artist is able to unwind: his title "Verbally processing" isn't a copyright infringement of Marvin Gaye's hit. At the time of the release of the star's fifth album, "Subtract," this is the verdict of the New York court.

egg. The millions of Ed Sheeran fans feel relief after experiencing anguish. The heirs of Ed Townsend (1929–2003), a co-signer on Marvin Gaye's 1973 soul hit "Let's Get It On," who had accused the English singer of plagiarizing the song after he was accused of doing so in a federal court in Manhattan, were able to get the singer, who is now the best-selling artist in his native country and is well-known worldwide, out of the case. Which Thinking Out Loud, which was included on Ed Sheeran's second album in 2014, shares "strong similarities," according to them. It is true that the bass line, chord progression, and tempo can be confusing. In any case, you can likewise pay attention to the culpable piece without hearing the most established one immediately. Sheeran himself relates that once recordedThinking Without holding back sounded more like Van Morrison.

This is another aspect of the issue with the redhead's charming music: not especially splendid by its inventiveness, it frequently helps you to remember something different. Then again, he has an intriguing gift, which is to charge a group by showing up alone in front of an audience with a guitar. The singer can be seen chaining Thinking Out Loud and a portion of Let's Get It On in the video from a concert that took place in Zurich in November 2014, where the enthusiastic audience knows the lyrics. This video clip was shown to the jury during the New York trial, where musicologists from both sides argued. For some, this is evidence of plagiarism, while for others, it is a demonstration that two works written forty years apart can look similar to one another without being identical (in D major and E flat major).

Also see:

Regards, copies: Before Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke, there were other examples of pop culture plagiarism. On both sides of the court, there were antecedents. The Marvin Gaye Estate was awarded $7.4 million in damages in 2015 for allegedly plagiarizing Blurred Lines' 2013 hit Got To Give It Up (1977), which featured Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke. not really digression - the siphoned piece having essentially no song, it was conjured the getting of a "feeling" - maybe energized the main beneficiaries of Ed Townsend in a comparative methodology versus Sheeran. Who, as far as concerns him, had previously arisen successful from a court interestingly, English this time: in April 2022, two dark musicians designated his cylinder State of You , purportedly propelled by their Gracious Why .

Now that's a classic scenario, but why do these poor pop stars, who are the victims of their success, need to be pursued? We almost forget that the brave Ed Sheeran is releasing his fifth album, Subtract, today in a world where it's hard to line up three chords because no one has ever had the same brilliant idea in eight decades. characterized by a mathematical sign (—) like the other four. Who can do less can accomplish more here, and the thing is now guaranteed to number one. Since neither the singer's fortune nor his career, which he had threatened to end in the event of a defeat in court, are currently in jeopardy, we can infer that his heirs will be able to avoid having to sue any musicians in the future who might have the bizarre idea of plagiarizing an Ed Sheeran song.